Catherine Scorsese, Martin's Daughter Being Sued for Ruining the Success of "Campus Life"

Catherine Scorsese is being sued for ruining the success of "Campus Life" by, among other things, saying bad things to her father about the film's other producers.

Of all the strange ways to get sued, bad-mouthing your work colleagues to your father has got to be up there. Then again, if you're working in the film industry and your father is Martin Scorsese, these things can happen.

In late April, Catherine Scorsese filed a lawsuit that drew widespread notice thanks to her famous last name. In New York federal court, she alleged that she had provided co-producing and co-directing services on a movie entitled Campus Life. She says the defendant -- Jumpview Entertainment -- fraudulently promised her 25 percent of the company's profits and then backed away from an oral agreement, even after she had arranged for her father and actor Ray Liotta to play small parts in the film.

The other side gathered little attention.

Jumpview filed its own lawsuit against Ms. Scorsese in a Pennsylvania county court. The film company slammed her for all sorts of allegedly erratic behavior during the production of Campus Life and threw in some curious legal claims. For instance, getting her daddy to not promote the film allegedly equates to tortious interference. And telling her father that she was deprived of profits allegedly rises to defamation.

Now, both sides are jockeying for position in the lawsuits.

Scorsese is being represented by the same firm -- Lavely & Singer -- that handles her father's litigation. Her complaint against Jumpview starts off with a trademark Martin Singer flourish:

                              "If you want to do business with people who commit fraud, then Defendants are the perfect business partners for you. Similarly, if you want to render valuable services for free despite being promised that you would receive fair compensation, then you should render those services for Defendants. And if you have ever dreamed of working with people who will do anything to benefit themselves at your expense, than Defendants are your dream come true."

Jumpview and its co-founders Michael Simon and Kenneth Waddell have their own nasty characterization of what occurred and may have even topped what Singer's firm had to say. Their attorneys say they originally filed the lawsuit in last February. In June, after the case was removed to a federal court, an amended complaint was filed.

Read Complaint Here... http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/sites/default/files/custom/Documents/ESQ/catherinescorsese.pdf

Waddell admits offering the younger Scorsese -- the two met at New York Film School -- a role as a producer for Campus Life and representing that she'd receive a percentage of profits on the film. But Jumpview also asserts all sorts of alleged promises that Scorsese made on her end but didn't deliver. For example, she offered free studio space, according to an amended complaint filed in mid-June, as well as a free stunt coordinator, free grip and lighting equipment and a free  Liotta. These things weren't free. Liotta, for example, charged $500 a day.

The lawsuit against Scorsese follows with more instances of how she allegedly forced the production to incur expenses and how her "behavior became increasingly erratic and threatening as she felt her contributions were not being appreciated."

Read More.... http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/martin-scorsese-plays-odd-role-581781

Law Offices of Jonathan Franklin
Open Evenings and Weekends this Summer
Call Us Now (310) 273-9600   
 http://www.jonathanfranklinlaw.com

Martin Scorsese Project Triggers New $20 Million Lawsuit

The attorney who once represented '300' producer Gianni Nunnari is now going after his former client over fraud allegations.

The lawsuit from New York lawyer Aaron Richard Golub is a complicated, decade-spanning one that deals with conflicts, duties and representations made in Hollywood. It also marks the latest twist in an old battle between two Italian cinema giants -- Nunnari and Vittorio Cecchi Gori -- as well as the latest development in an ongoing battle over Silence, which Scorsese agreed to direct but has languished in development for more than two decades.

Who is Gianni Nunnari?
He was the former president of Cecchi Gori Pictures from 1996 until 2008. But he was also the head of Hollywood Gang Productions, a company that loaned out his producing services. In effect, he was what a judge once termed a "dual agent," representing Cecchi Gori's interests on one hand and his own on the other. This brought trouble.

Who is Vittorio Cecchi Gori?
He was the son of a famous Italian film mogul who took the reigns of the family business. In the 1990s, the Cecchi Gori Group was an important player in Hollywood with relationships with Silvio Berlusconi and Rupert Murdoch, often acting as the middle man for Hollywood studios eager to sell foreign distribution rights.

Nunnari had a 25-year friendship with the Gori family and headed the company's U.S.-based division, but the relationship deteriorated between 2006 and 2008 when Gori discovered that Nunnari was using the company's offices to operate his own Hollywood Gang Productions and take prized projects away from Cecchi Gori Pictures.

Before the relationship deteriorated -- which set off litigation between Nunnari and Gori -- Hollywood Gang Productions sued Scorsese for failure to live up to an agreement to direct Silence, based on an award-winning Japanese novel by Shusaku Endo.

The lawyer who brought that lawsuit in 2003 was Aaron Richard Golub, who was working on a contingency basis. A settlement in the lawsuit represented a bonanza for Nunnari's Hollywood Gang Productions and presumably Golub. Scorsese agreed to pay $1 million and an "annuity" for substantial future income. Nunnari also got executive producer credit on Scorsese's The Departed and Shutter Island.

But in 2011, a decision from a California judge came in the legal war between Nunnari and Gori. The judge dismissed Nunnari's claims for wrongful termination and in extraordinarily strong language, ruled in favor of Gori's allegations of breach of fiduciary duties, fraud and other claims.

So, Cecchi Gori Pictures was declared the owner of Silence, and in the aftermath of the victory, the company had taken up a new fight with Scorsese over his continued failure to direct the film. In November, Scorsese defended waiting 22 years to direct the picture, and among other things, alluded to the Gori-Nunnari cloud that hung over the film as one of the reasons.

Now that Nunnari has lost to Gori, he must face claims from his contingency-fee lawyer, Golub, who cites "Nunnari's judicially determined persistent pattern of untruthfullness and deception"
Golub alleges that facts were concealed to him by Nunnari when he entered into a retainer agreement and brought the original 2003 lawsuit against Scorsese.

He says that if he had known of "Nunnari's dishonest, unlawful and nefarious business practices, fraud, constructive fraud, concealments, and breaches of fiduciary duties and breaches of employment agreements, then Plaintiffs never would have entered into the retainer agreements with Defendant or continued in the legal representation of Defendant."

Read the full complaint, which includes a copy of the judge's 2011 decision in the Nunnari-Gori war... http://www.scribd.com/doc/125651122/Nun-Nari

Read More... http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/martin-scorsese-project-triggers-new-421844